Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Rescheduling of Samya Badh Jagrukta .....
Dear Sir,
I hope all RWA Bhagidars have received an invitation today (01/07/13) from the CM (forwarded by SDM G/N vide his letter DC(E)/Bhagidari Cell/2-13/2216-2655 dated 21/06/2013, rescheduling the above Shivir on 14/07/2013 at Yamuna Sports Complex.
This Shivir was earlier scheduled on 23/06/2013 at the same venue. When we and may be other Bhgidars reached the venue, they were told by the Guard that the meeting had been postponed. The meeting was postponed without informing Bhagidars, at least we did not receive any intimation. Surprisingly, the present letter does not have even a single word of apology either from the SDM or the CM ! Perhaps apologising is not the culture in the govt. Poor Bhagidars!
Secondly, the SDM wants a soft as well as a hard copy of the list of office bearers of all the RWAs. Further surprising, no Email address or Telephone/Mobile number has been provided on his letter head. I don't know where to send the soft copy! May be we are expected to visit his office to know his email address!
Ram Gupta
General Secretary
Priyadarshini Vihar RWA
Monday, July 1, 2013
Must read : Cyber crooks create fake Delhi Jal Board site
NEW DELHI: If you recently paid your water bills online, your money may have landed in the pockets of cyber crooks. The Delhi Jal Board has lodged a complaint against a fake department website, very similar to the real one, that may have been used to dupe consumers.
A source said that the fake website was blocked after DJB's chief engineer approached the crime branch. The team of cyber cell experts is investigating the case and an FIR under the information technology (66A) Act has been registered, a senior police officer said.
The fake website, www.delhijalboard.in, looks remarkably like the original website. The crooks have also managed to forge the home ministry and Delhi government logos, police sources said. The fake website contained data from the original website and had options for direct bill payments.
Sources said the Internet Service Provider was contacted for more details and to block the fake website. Cops are now trying to trace the IP address of the website through which they would zoom in to the location and computer where it was created , a source said.
with thanks : Times of India : LINK : for detailed news
CITIZENS FRONT FOR WATER DEMOCRACY : PRESS RELEASE
DATED: 1ST JULY 2013
The water activists, trade unions, NGO and RWAs from all over India gathered in Nagpur and constituted a National Platform to fight against water privatization in India. The activists from Delhi, Assam, North East, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Karnataka, Chhattisgarh, Bihar were present in the meeting.
Shri SA Naqvi was elected as the National Coordinator of the NPAWP and Smt. Nirmla Sharma was elected as Regional Coordinator for Northern Zone along with Shri Jammu Anand from west, Shri Rajinder Prabhakar from South, Shri Subrato Chakrabarti from North East, Shri Saurabh from East and Shri Rahamat from Central zone. Shri Raman Kanan, Afsar Jafri, Dr. A.K. Arun, Ms Kiran Shaheen, Pranjal, Gaurav Diwedi, Sanjay Sharma and Vinay Bundur were elected in the National team.
The National Platform will raise voice and initiate people’s moment against water privatization in India. The NPAWP is of the view that real owners of water are communities and governments are only custodians of water. The water privatization is being imposed forcefully on people for ensuring corporate profits.
The activists were of the view that when after the bad experiences of water privatization there is a trend of re-municipalization of water in Europe the only driving force to water privatization in India is corruption.
The NPAWP through a resolution rejected the Y.K. Alagh committee report, draft National Water Frame Work Laws and National Water Policy 2012 and all efforts of comodification of water. Soon NPAWP will initiate mass movement against Government’s undemocratic moves to privatize and commodify people’s water. NPAWP policy statement described as Nagpur declaration has emphasized people’s right to water. NPAWP will raise all issues relating to water like its environmental aspects, ecological concerns, dams, rivers etc and oppose all forms of water commercialization. (copy attached)
NPAWP declared the Uttrakhand disaster as man-made disaster and a result of callus and anti environment policies of Central and State Governments. It passed a resolution opposing such infrastructure development anywhere in India. The new National body will also extend support to movements opposing dams, river diversions or river linking.
The NPAWP has plans to raise a wide spread movement against water privatization in Delhi. It will take the opposition of water privatization to each and every street of Delhi and will educate the people how the PPP projects are influenced by corruption, how Delhi Government ensured the corporate profits and increasing the water tariffs. NPAWP will ask the Political parties, Political candidates and representative their stand on water privatization, corruption in PPP projects, increasing water tariffs and extending benefits to corporate in forthcoming Delhi assembly elections.
S.A. Naqvi
National Coordinator
NPAWP
Saturday, June 29, 2013
RWAs Directory of Delhi on www.RWABhagidari.com
Friday, June 28, 2013
Delhi: you'll get water quality check only once in 27 yrs
After reading about the deaths reportedly linked to drinking of contaminated water at NCERT colony in south Delhi, if the quality of water you drink is worrying you, your anxiety is not unfounded.
Chances are your water supply would be quality checked only once in 27 years.
The Delhi Jal Board (DJB) lifts on an average 400 samples across the city per day. However, considering the number of buildings and public places, the number is extremely small. Census 2011 puts the number of houses at 40,00,000. Even if we consider this statistic, excluding public places, the chance of a particular house figuring again in random sampling comes after 10,000 days — about 27 years.
“There are 1,500 planned colonies. Then there are several unauthorised colonies, which also consume water. The small sample indicates that DJB is unable to reach colony levels,” said Dunu Roy of NGO Hazard Centre.
Debashree Mukherjee, DJB CEO, says, “This (400) is not a small size. This is over and above samples tested at water treatment plants. For other areas, our tests are ample.”
with thanks : Hindustan Times : LINK
Delhi: confusion over who maintains pipelines
A war of words erupts between the consumers and the Delhi Jal Board (DJB) every time people start falling ill after consuming contaminated water.
While Delhiites blame the DJB and expect it to take care of leaking pipelines, the agency claims that contamination mostly happens at the consumers’ end and that it is their (consumer’s) responsibility to change the ferrule.
A ferrule is the point where consumers’ pipe connects with the main supply pipeline.
Sanjam Chima, DJB’s Consultant (PR), cites the provisions of the Delhi Jal Board Act, 1998, for it. As per a clause titled ‘Power to require water supply to be taken and to require maintenance of service pipes’, consumers are supposed to lay the delivery pipe for every sanctioned connection through a licensed plumber at their own cost from the main to their homes, including the ferrule.
Also, the Act say that it is the duty of the consumer to maintain, repair and replace, whenever required, such delivery pipes at his own cost. Customers are to get these pipes inspected at their cost once in 15 years.
“If found rusted or leaking, the work for repair or replacement shall be done by the consumer through a licenced plumber,” said Chima.
Ankush Wohra, president of New Delhi South Extension I (NDSE I) RWA, however, finds this logic weird. “If the DJB changes or repairs it, that will ensure uniformity.
Otherwise someone can put a bigger ferrule for more water. If the DJB Act actually doesn’t permit it, the relevant provisions should be changed.”
with thanks : Hindustan Times : LINK
Power regulator to announce revised tariff for 2013 by July
The new power tariffs for this year will be in place by July, said Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) on Wednesday.
The announcement by the power regulator came after the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity asked the DERC to ensure that the tariff order is in place by April every year.
Taking note of the delay in announcing a tariff order in April by DERC, the tribunal has asked the city power regulator to enforce it on time in the future. “The new tariff order for this year will be in place by July. We have not been in touch with the government regarding subsidy on power tariff,” PD Sudhakar, DERC chairman.
“There are seven utilities who had to submit their petitions and we kept receiving the petitions spread over December to February. We also had to change the consultant who was engaged with the process of tariff determination as there was some conflict of interest. One discom also decided to amend its petition and hence all this led to delays,” said Sudhakar.
“We will try our best to enforce this by April itself in the future,” he added.
The tribunal also said in its order that the exercise of providing relief to the consumers by way of subsidy should be undertaken only after the tariff order has been announced and there should be no delay due to this.
with thanks : Hindustan Times : LINK
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Delhi: SC grants doctor relief in power theft case
If a power theft case is pending, a consumer’s electricity supply cannot be disconnected, the Supreme Court said on Tuesday.
A vacation bench headed by Justice AK Patnaik ordered BSES to restore power supply within 48 hours at premises in Vasant Kunj occupied by a lady doctor.
On a petition by Meena Chaudhary, the court held it was the duty of the power company to supply electricity to all owners in all premises.
Chaudhary is facing a power theft case since 2010. Electricity supply to the premises where she lives was disconnected a few days ago. Despite her request, the power company did not grant a meter connection in her name as she wasn’t the owner of the premises.
At this, the bench clarified that even if the original consumer did not want the connection, it would be restored in Chaudhary’s name subject to formalities and told the lady doctor to pay the electricity charges.
“If a landlord does not pay up, the tenant has to be given the power connection. We don’t want any dispute to come in the way of supply of electricity,” the court observed orally, adding Section 43 of the Electricity Act obliges a power company to supply electricity to a owner or an occupier on request.
Chaudhary had approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking restoration of power supply to her residential premises. She claimed the power company had removed the electricity meter in 2007, while she was away in Patna for official work.
According to her, power supply continued at her place and she kept paying the provisional bill raised by BSES. Meanwhile, she even gave five representations to the company for installing a meter. However, in 2010 BSES registered a theft case against her and disconnected the supply few days ago.
with thanks : Hindustan Times : LINK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
